Anthony Richardson's poor decision-making suggests he might not be 'the guy' for the Colts
I've seen a lot of bad quarterback play in my day. That [interception] should be a play that you should file away as one that's like, is he the guy? Probably not.
More from this episode
View episodeThe start of the 2024 season proves that coaching matters more than anything else in the NFL
The big picture for me before we get into all the games is Sam Darnold's three and oh, Geno Smith's three and oh... this start of the 2024 season has just been a red blinking light of coaching matters a lot.
Kevin O'Connell is one of the best coaches in the NFL
Minnesota might have one of the best coaches in the league. Yes. And I would also put McVay's performance this week right up there too.
Nick Sirianni does not deserve to be let off the hook for his poor coaching despite the Eagles' win
I'm hoping that Max doesn't let [Sirianni] off the hook. Yeah. He doesn't deserve to be left off the hook. They won the game and they were the better team in this game... That was a horrible display of coaching from him today.
More from PFT Commenter
View profileThe Celtics are statistically a better team without Jaylen Brown
Jalen Brown has the second worst plus minus of any five time All Star over the past 10 years... Also the Celtics win more games without Jalen Brown than when he is playing... Last year with, with Jalen Brown, they won 66% of their games without, they won 80%... Their entire career with Jalen Brown. They are 263 and 1 31. That's 67% without Brown. There're 60 and 26, 70%.
The Celtics are no longer eligible to be the NBA's team of the 2020s without Jaylen Brown
If the Celtics rebuild and they get back to like the NBA finals, let's say in like 2029, let's say they win another chip in 2029, that's a different team. Like the core is completely different without Jalen Brown. I don't know that you could consider the Celtics to ever even be eligible for team of the 2020s. Because it's gonna be two different iterations of the team.
FIFA must change the rule so a red card does not result in a next-game suspension
I think it's just a, a terrible rule that if you get a red card from a game that you're also suspended for the next game. Yeah. You're already serving your punishment by, by sitting out the rest of that game and your team has to go down one player. Why do you have to sit out the next game?