Skip to content
PMTPMT DB
Win
PFT CommenterPFT Commenter

MLB owners will use any 2020 player concessions as leverage to implement a future salary cap

If the players choose to go ahead and say, 'yeah, we will take your demand this season to do essentially a soft salary cap for this one year,' do you think that there's any possibility that the owners don't use that as future leverage in the next negotiation? I think that they're going to take whatever they can get and any sacrifice that the players make, that's going to come back to bite them in the ass for future generations.

The 2022 MLB lockout and the ensuing CBA negotiations saw owners continue to push for things the players viewed as salary cap mechanisms, proving PFT's point about perpetual leverage.

More from this episode

View episode
Win
May 29, 2020
#14625
Big CatBig Cat

Fake crowd noise in sports broadcasts is a good idea with no downside

I'm totally down with the fake crowd noise. They had it for the Bundesliga. I thought it was awesome. It really does make it seem like a real game... I don't see any downside. I know the opposition to that is we want to hear the players talk, but as soon as players know that they're on a live mic, they're not going to talk the same way.

The major US sports leagues (NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL) all eventually used artificial crowd noise during the 2020 seasons with generally positive reception.
Win
May 29, 2020
#14626
Big CatBig Cat

MLB owners are bluffing about canceling the season to force a better deal

I keep going back to the fact that it feels like the owners are okay threatening this year not having baseball, and that tells you everything. Because if they are, that means that they're probably not losing as much money as they're claiming they're going to lose. They're just trying to get a good deal.

The 2020 season did eventually happen, suggesting the threats were indeed part of the negotiation leverage to reduce player salaries for the shortened season.
Loss
May 29, 2020·Fyre Fest
#20726
PFT CommenterPFT Commenter

The government is coming for the First Amendment by regulating comment sections

The government is coming for comment sections. They're taking away our First Amendment. They are coming for our First Amendment and they're trying to silence the internet commenters of America. It means right now that no one's allowed to talk trash on the internet.

Hot TakePoliticsHotSarcastic
The claim is a hyperbolic interpretation of legal changes to platform liability, making it literally incorrect as a legal fact but a valid satirical stance.

More from PFT Commenter

View profile
Void
PFT CommenterPFT Commenter

Nate Oats would not be a great fit at UNC

I don't think he'd be a great fit there. Would people be talking about Nate Oats as much for this job if he didn't wear those jackets? They feel like Carolina jackets. It feels like he's been accepting people into anticipating him being the next UNC coach for a while.

Oats did not take the UNC job; the outcome of whether he'd have been a 'great fit' is subjective.
Open
PFT CommenterPFT Commenter

James Wood will be a monster this season and hit 35 plus home runs

The only thing I have to look forward to this season is James Wood just being a fucking monster and getting 35 plus home runs. That's the only thing that I'm going to this season looking forward to as a Nats fan.

James Wood is a high-upside prospect, but 35+ home runs for a rookie/young player is a significant mark.
Loss
PFT CommenterPFT Commenter

Tom Brady never processed 9/11 because he was such a psycho about football

He just had delayed onset grief. Anything that happened during his playing career, he never processed any of it outside of football. Tom Brady probably never processed 9/11. He was such a psycho, all he cared about was football. He probably found out about it like two years ago.

Hyperbolic satirical claim.

Search

Search takes, episodes, and speakers